Fukuyama argued in 1989 that the Hegelian version of the end of history—a liberal state with a market economy—was more likely than a communist end of history, and he still believes this is the case.

factualpending

Speaker

Francis Fukuyama

Evidence Quote

the argument that I was making back in 1989 was that the Hegelian version where the end of history was really a liberal state and a market economy looked much more likely than a communist uh end of history.

Source

Francis Fukuyama: Why Global Order Is Breaking Down And Why the “End of History” Never HappenedDecoding Geopolitics Podcast with Dominik Presl
Created: 8/12/2026, 5:52:02 PM

My Notes

Loading notes...