
What this covers
#oxfordpakistanprogramme #oxfordlecture #professorjeffreysachs The Geopolitics Of a Changing World by Professor Jeffrey Sachs.
-Jeffrey Sachs is a world-renowned economics professor, bestselling author, and global leader in sustainable development. Sachs serves as the Director of the Center for Sustainable Development at Columbia University, where he holds the rank of University Professor. Sachs was the Director of the Earth Institute at Columbia University from 2002 to 2016.Prior to Columbia, Sachs spent over twenty years as a professor at Harvard University, including as the Galen L. Stone Professor of International Trade. Sachs has authored and edited numerous books, including three New York Times bestsellers: The End of Poverty (2005), Common Wealth: Economics for a Crowded Planet (2008), and The Price of Civilization (2011). He is the recipient of several international prizes and has advised several governments across the globe. Prof Sachs has also served as the Special Advisor to UN Secretaries-General Kofi Annan, Ban Ki-moon, and António Guterres.
-The Dadabhoy Foundation is a non-profit organization based in Karachi that seeks to promote the educational, cultural, and scientific development of Pakistani society. The Sir Muhammad Iqbal Lecture is supported by the Dadabhoy Foundation whose Board of Trustees includes Mr Abdul Ghani Dadabhoy, an Oxford alumnus.
-The Oxford Pakistan Programme (OPP) is an initiative led by Pakistani-origin alumni and academics that seeks to generate new opportunities for Pakistani-origin scholars at the University of Oxford, promote academic exchange between Oxford and Pakistan’s institutions of higher learning and broaden academic conversations on Pakistan at oxford. The OPP is anchored at Lady Margaret Hall. For further information visit: https://oxpakprogramme.org/. Date: 2 March 2023 Time: 5:00PM GMT (10PM PST) Location: Simpkins Lee Theatre, Lady Margaret Hall, Norham Gardens, Oxford OX2 6QA
Source description (no synthesized summary yet).
Sachs argues that international relations theory must shift from describing the tragic inevitability of great power conflict to prescriptively solving it through negotiation, de-escalation, and recognition of shared humanity across different types of wars (imperial, hegemonic, and inter-ethnic), drawing on ancient wisdom traditions to build a geopolitics of peace rather than accepting perpetual conflict.
- International relations must be normative (prescriptive for peace) not merely descriptive of conflict, analogous to how medicine aims to cure disease not just explain it
- The prisoner's dilemma shows escalation is rational under current assumptions but talking and verification can move outcomes from mutual loss to mutual gain
- Different wars require different solutions: convergence and collective security end imperial wars; negotiation and trust reduce hegemonic conflict; group rights and tolerance address inter-ethnic violence
This asset isn't compiled yet
You're seeing its claims, ranked. Compile it to build the argument threads, weight them, and check each claim against your library — the full view.
The prisoner's dilemma game shows that under conditions of mutual uncertainty and competitive incentives, both the U.S. and Russia rationally choose escalation even though mutual de-escalation (cooperation in the top-left cell) would leave both better off, trapping them in the bottom-right cell of mutual loss—the core of the tragedy of great power politics.
“if Russia de-escalates the U.S says well if we de-escalate we get five but if we escalate we get 10. so if Russia de-escalates we should escalate...what about if Russia escalates well if we de-escalate disaster we get -10 but if we also escalate not good but not as bad as de-escalating minus five so whatever Russia does our best strategy is to escalate this is the so-called dominant strategy...both sides escalate that's mirrorsheimer's point that that is the rational action to take”
Kennedy's principle 'let us never negotiate out of fear but let us never fear to negotiate' and Reagan's principle 'trust but verify' are the two essential foundations for moving from escalation to de-escalation in great power conflicts, requiring both the willingness to talk and verification mechanisms to ensure compliance.
“I believe that the two answers to this first is a point that John F Kennedy made...let us never negotiate out of fear but let us never fear to negotiate we need to sit down to talk it's surprising how talking is a human activity that makes a substantive difference in allowing a solution to a social dilemma the other is a point that Ronald Reagan emphasized agreement is not based on trust it's not based on naivete it is trust but verify”
John F. Kennedy nearly stumbled into full-scale nuclear war during the Cuban Missile Crisis despite coming into office more sensitive to nuclear dangers than any modern U.S. president, demonstrating how even wise leaders can be drawn toward catastrophe by the structural dynamics of state power and international competition.
“Kennedy came in more sensitive to this subject then any president of modern history yet he nearly stumbled into full-scale nuclear war in the Cuban Missile Crisis and this is something telling for us also because the world is difficult and complicated and even if you come in with the wisdom of this statement because of how state power works and misfunctions and terrible blunders by Kennedy in the early stages of his government especially the invasion of Cuba in the spring of 1961 and the lies that he told about it initially and he's my favorite President uh this by his actions and the subsequent actions of the Soviet chairman Nikita Khrushchev brought us to not just the brink of nuclear war but seconds of within the launch of nuclear war”
The world holds technologies capable of ending poverty and providing universal education and healthcare, but these same technologies enable thermonuclear weapons and environmental destruction, creating an existential duality where the choice between human flourishing and annihilation is now in human hands.
“we have technologies that are remarkable so remarkable that if we put our mind to it poverty could be ended education could be accessible to every child in the world we could have Universal Health Coverage...but those same Technologies that same breakthrough in science of how semiconductors work or how solid-state physics works is also the same technology that enables us to make thermonuclear weapons to destroy the world through nuclear war”
In 2008, the U.S. announced plans to expand NATO to Ukraine and Georgia, which Putin explicitly stated would be Russia's red line, telling Bush in Bucharest that 'you do this, you will find out'—establishing a clear warning that NATO expansion to Ukraine would trigger military response.
“and in 2008 it said we will expand NATO to Ukraine and to Georgia take a look at the map to understand what this is about the goal is to surround Russia in the Black Sea this is an explicit understanding because then you have Ukraine Romania Bulgaria turkey Georgia completely surrounding the Russian Fleet in Sebastopol that's the goal that Russia is unable to project any power in the Eastern Mediterranean or the Middle East Putin told bush in Bucharest in 2008 you do this you will find out this is absolutely our red line don't do this”
In 1820 Asia held 60 percent of global output and per capita incomes were roughly equal between Asia and the North Atlantic region, but the steam engine (invented by James Watt in 1776) gave Britain decisive technological advantage, enabling the British conquest of India and subjugation of Asia, creating the Divergence period (1800-1950) where North Atlantic output peaked at 80 percent by 1950.
“as late as 1820 Asia had 60 percent of world output and as late as 1820 the Indian subcontinent was the manufacturing center of the world...in 1790 the steam engine was connected to a belt to move the spinning Jennys and to move the power looms and the rest one could say history Britain used every trick in the book uh protectionism control over the ports military force and mechanization to destroy the Indian uh text style industry in the early 19th century...by 1950 basically and from then on the lines start to converge again”
Game theory research shows that when parties playing the prisoner's dilemma communicate with each other before playing, they cooperate approximately 90 percent of the time even without binding agreements, demonstrating that dialogue fundamentally changes the game structure and enables cooperation.
“in-game Theory there is a famous finding and the famous finding is if you let people playing the prisoners dilemma talk with each other before they played even without any binding agreement they will cooperate 90 of the time and so the mere human touch of negotiation changes the game fundamentally”
The current generation of young people will receive a world in very fragile shape, facing extraordinary dangers from great power conflicts, environmental destruction, and nuclear war, and will need wisdom, cooperation, and collaboration across generations and borders to salvage human values and prevent catastrophe.
“you are very very soon the leaders of this world uh you're going to receive a world in very fragile shape I have to tell you and we're going to need and you're going to need your wisdom and your cooperation and collaboration across the world and across your generation to salvage some uh the human values that Allama Iqbal I aspired to so it's a especially meaningful for me to give a lecture in his memory and especially in the memory of of his purposes”
After Gorbachev's unilateral Warsaw Pact dissolution, the U.S. and West Germany explicitly promised the Soviet Union that NATO would not expand eastward, a commitment documented in George Washington University archives, but the U.S. broke this promise repeatedly under Clinton, Bush, and Obama administrations through NATO expansion to Poland, Czech Republic, Hungary, the Baltics, and finally toward Ukraine and Georgia.
“at the time that Gorbachev made this move the United States and Germany especially Germany because it was interested in German reunification made very clear that the West would not take advantage of the Soviets unilateral action by expanding the U.S military Alliance Eastward this is not a myth this is hard facts and you can find this on uh the uh George Washington University archives...the U.S had a different view the U.S starting in 1992 took the view that now we were in a U.S led world a unipolar world and that the U.S could do what it wanted”
Allama Iqbal, in 'The Reconstruction of Religious Thought in Islam,' articulated Islam as a message for all humanity (not only believers), advocated for rational foundations of Islamic thought aligned with science, and called for a single human family united through the brotherhood of man transcending race, nationality, color, and language.
“Iqbal has a great thinker and philosopher as well as a poet and I can't vouch for his poetry through translation but I can vouch for his wisdom in this wonderful book of the Reconstruction of religious thought in Islam offered the goal of Islam as a message for all Humanity not a message for the Believers a message for all humanity and he argued that we need to search for rational foundations uh science and Islam...only one Unity is dependable and that is unity of the Brotherhood of Man which is above Race nationality color or language”
The United Nations, founded by Franklin Roosevelt as the greatest idea of his presidency, remains indispensable for human survival despite its fragility in the face of great power politics, private greed, and state impunity, and represents the best available institutional framework for expressing universal human family aspirations.
“I believe that the United Nations which was the greatest idea of our greatest President Franklin Roosevelt remains indispensable for our survival even as its fragility is evident in the face of great power politics private greed and state impunity so the world's very difficult the UN has a very difficult time functioning in a difficult world but it remains in my view our best hope for the universal Human family”
The U.S. and Europe did not actually isolate Russia through sanctions; Russia continues trading with Africa, Latin America, and Asia, and when U.N. votes are counted by population, roughly 60-70 percent of the world consistently refuses to vote with the West, while the West gets 20-30 percent of votes, showing that the Ukraine conflict is a Western project not a globally supported position.
“the United States and Europe did not isolate Russia at all Russia trades with all of the rest of the world with Africa with Latin America and with Asia when you count the votes at the U.N if you count them by population roughly 60 to 70 percent of the world always refuses to vote with the West the West gets somewhere between 20 and 30 percent of the vote most typically this is a western project and it is a western project either because of the most absurd failure of diplomacy or because they're not telling the truth”
Sachs, despite 40 years of engagement with China and having many students and friends in senior positions in China, could never have imagined that U.S.-China tensions would reach current levels, proving that he was wrong and Mearsheimer's prediction of China becoming an enemy was correct as China's power grew.
“I have to say he was right I was certainly wrong because I've been engaged with China for 40 years now many of my students are senior officials in China many are academics in China and I could never imagine that we would have these tensions because China is not a threat to the world only in our newspapers is a threat to the world...as mirsheimer predicted uncannily in 2002 he said this will lead to the onset of hostility I have to say he was right”
Rachel's observation that reducing economic inequality between ethnic groups helps build peace is correct, and Sachs' discussion implies that shared economic interests and prosperity create structural incentives for cooperation that reduce inter-ethnic and inter-national violence.
“I think in looking for solutions to into ethnic conflict I would hunt to my own doctoral research which suggests that looking at bridging economic inequality between different ethnic groups helps to build Peace”
Britain used protectionism, control over ports, military force, and mechanization to destroy the Indian textile industry in the early 19th century and subsequently subjugate India, which had been the textile center of the world at the end of the 18th century.
“Britain used every trick in the book uh protectionism control over the ports military force and mechanization to destroy the Indian uh text style industry in the early 19th century and to subjugate India afterwards”
China overtook the United States in total GDP measured at purchasing power parity in 2011, according to IMF data, making it the larger economy, and this economic convergence has led to the onset of hostility and U.S. efforts to contain China.
“according to the international monetary fund China overtook the United States in total output in 2011. these are GDP measured at purchasing power prices not at market exchange rates”
After the 2014 overthrow, Ukrainian military forces and units broke away and began insurgency in Lugansk and Donetsk with weapons and equipment derived from Ukrainian Army contingents; the US then sent billions of dollars in weapons to Ukraine from 2014-2021 to build up the Ukrainian military.
“the month after Russia retook Crimea many Russian forces in the Ukrainian military broke away from the military took their equipment and started the Insurrection in luganskin Donetsk these were Ukrainian weapons that came from contingents of the Ukrainian Army the fighting started in eastern Ukraine at that time the United States send billions of dollars of weapons to Ukraine During the period 2014 to 2021 building Ukraine's Army and modernizing it”
Fear operates as a subcortical, fast, reactive decision-making system that derails the cognitive, rational acts needed to move from conflict to cooperation; addressing fear requires engagement of higher cognitive functions and understanding of the other side's legitimate concerns.
“fear is a deep driver of this...they're wonderful articles by psychologists social psychologists neuroscientists and conflict resolution Specialists emphasizing the role of fear really as a subcortical fast uh reactive kind of decision-making to move from the lower right cell in Conflict to the upper left cell in cooperation is a cognitive act it's not an emotional act it's a cognitive act and fear derails that kind of cognitive act to an important extent”
The BRICS countries (Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa) now have larger combined GDP than the G7 countries, representing remarkable economic convergence and the end of the 150-year period of North Atlantic dominance that resulted from technological divergence after the steam engine invention.
“the brics countries Brazil Russia India China and South Africa are now larger than the G7 countries this is rather remarkable to my mind great because it means economic convergence taking place it means a narrowing of the Gap it means that the strange Divergence of the industrial era from roughly 1750 I'll say until 1950 which produced the north atlantic-led world is over good why should the North Atlantic with 10 percent of the world population lead the world”
Technological convergence—where poor countries narrow the capability and income gap with rich countries—paradoxically increases the risk of great power wars because rising powers compete more aggressively to achieve dominance, triggering the Thucydides Trap where incumbent powers fear being overtaken while rising powers fear being contained.
“technological convergence means that the poor countries are catching up with the Richer countries surprisingly that's also conducive to war but typically to the wars of competition because as the poorer countries are narrowing the Gap with the Richer countries the two come into direct competition with each other so periods of technological convergence tend to be periods of Wars of competition...Rising Powers fear that they'll be held back by incumbent powers...incumbent Powers fear they'll be overtaken by Rising Powers that's the so-called thucydides trap”
Kennedy's 1963 peace speech, in which he called for U.S. empathy toward the Soviet Union and recognition that Soviets were humans wanting peace, directly led to Khrushchev's willingness to sign a nuclear test ban treaty six weeks later—demonstrating that empathy and respect for the other side enable diplomatic breakthroughs.
“when he gave this speech Nikita Khrushchev heard it called the American Envoy in Moscow Avril Harriman and said this is the finest speech by an American president since Franklin Roosevelt I want to sign a peace agreement with your president six weeks later the partial nuclear Test Ban Treaty was signed this is how to get from the lower right to the upper left corner empathy Humanity decency speaking to the other side”
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights, brought to fruition by Eleanor Roosevelt through dialogue with philosophers, theologians, and leaders across all faiths, represents the closest humanity has come to expressing a common shared ethical ideal based on the proposition that all humans are born free and equal in dignity and rights.
“We are the 75th anniversary of the universal Declaration of Human Rights which is the closest we've ever come as Humanity to expressing a common shared ideal this was brought to fruition by Eleanor Roosevelt who was the remarkable wife of our remarkable president and she was absolutely remarkable and in every way and brought together philosophers and theologians uh and uh leaders from across the world and from all faiths to forge the universal Declaration of Human Rights and it is based on the idea that all human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights”
In 2014, the U.S. helped overthrow the Ukrainian government of Yanukovych, with evidence including a recording of Assistant Secretary of State Victoria Newland discussing future cabinet appointments two weeks before the coup, and U.S. funding of the Maidan demonstrations and violent protests that preceded the overthrow.
“in 2014 the United States helped to overthrow the Ukrainian government have no doubt about it you can even listen to the tape of Victoria Newman who was then the assistant Secretary of State speaking to the U.S ambassador in Ukraine Jeffrey piatt about who's going to come into the government two weeks before the overthrow I know firsthand about this the United States helped to pay for the maidan revolution so-called the protest the demonstrations and the violence that came came from the Ukrainian side not from these security forces of Yanukovych this was a coup you this is important to understand because those are the first shots of the war”
The U.S. unilateral withdrawal from the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty in 2002 was taken by Russia as a direct and immediate threat of potential U.S. first-strike capability, and the subsequent Iraq invasion on false pretenses represented reckless regime change wars that escalated Russian threat perception further.
“then came two terrible decisions first the United States unilaterally walked out of the anti-ballistic missile treaty in 2002. this was taken as a direct and immediate threat to Russia because it meant the possibility of the United States looking for First Strike potential against Russia it was a unilateral action by one of our worst governments in our modern history...then in 2003 came the completely unprovoked Iraq War on completely false pretenses hooked up phony intelligence to launch a war of regime change again that raised temperatures further”
In 2011, the U.S. instructed the CIA to overthrow Bashar al-Assad in Syria, creating a U.S. regime change operation (rather than a civil war) that the U.N. negotiated an end to in 2012, but the U.S. rejected the ceasefire specifically because it refused to accept Assad's continued rule, prolonging Syrian suffering for regime change objective.
“in 2011 President Obama instructed the CIA and other parts of the U.S government to overthrow Bashar al-assad in Syria this was a U.S regime change operation the war broke out because of the United States Army a mercenary Army together with Saudi Arabia to overthrow Assad there would have been no war but for the United States in 2012 the U.N negotiated an end to the Syrian War it was rejected by one country the United States because the U.S said we insist on regime change as a predicate for ending this war”
NATO expansion in 1999 to Poland, Czech Republic, and Hungary, following the bombing of Serbia for 48 days to achieve regime change and break Kosovo away, represented the first war in Europe since World War II and raised Russian security concerns significantly, with George Kennan warning at the time that NATO expansion would lead to a new Cold War.
“The Next Step was 1999 for a variety of reasons NATO bombed Serbia 48 straight days to break Serbia into and to break Kosovo outside of Serbia it was disgraceful in my opinion that was the first war in Europe since World War II not the Ukraine war it was directed at Russia's close Ally and it was directed at regime change...the greatest Statesman of and Scholar of U.S Russian relations in our Modern History George Cannon said this will lead to a new Cold War declaring that at 1997”
President Biden and President Putin have had zero substantive phone conversations in the year since the Ukraine war began, representing a complete failure of basic statecraft and negotiation despite the high stakes, when even five-year-olds would try to talk to resolve disputes.
“how many times has President Biden spoken with President Putin during the year since the war started I'll give you a hint it's less than one and it's an integer it is zero so this is not grown up five-year-olds would do better”
The post-Maidan Ukrainian government immediately ended the policy of neutrality, passed a law outlawing the Russian language, and was backed by the U.S. with billions in weapons during 2014-2021, building and fortifying Ukraine's military capacity, making it clear the U.S. intended Ukraine as a military proxy against Russia.
“the next day ended the neutrality even passed a law outlawing the Russian language one day though not implemented but that was the beginning of the war...the United States send billions of dollars of weapons to Ukraine During the period 2014 to 2021 building Ukraine's Army and modernizing it which is why it could fight as effectively as it did this past year in all of the fortifications these cities turned into fortresses the heavy heavy armaments that was billions of dollars of U.S funding to arm an anti-russian regime that it had helped bring to power”
A questioner argues that Russia was the primary provocateur in Ukraine, not the U.S., and that when Russia invaded Ukraine in 2022, the escalatory dynamic shifted such that containing Russian aggression became necessary to prevent future bullying of Eastern Europe, making the prisoner's dilemma asymmetrical.
“I think your understanding of America being the primarily provocative actor with China I would agree but I think in Ukraine it strikes me as as that Russia is the primary provocateur...when Russia invaded Ukraine they escalated and the USD escalated and Russia ended up with all 10 points and so I can understand when that game is repeated and um Russia invades all of Ukraine there is um the feeling that perhaps a response is something that's required to block Russia from from being a bully in Eastern Europe”
Virtue ethics, rather than deontological or utilitarian ethics, is the correct approach because it places ethics as the core of individual responsibility and character development.
“they're all based on virtue ethics that the way to well-being is by building our characters which I think is a fundamental point it was not the dominant form of Ethics in the English and Germanic world in the last three centuries but it's making a very strong comeback and I think virtue ethics is the right form of Ethics uh more than deontological uh or utilitarian ethics because it puts ethics as the core of individual responsibility”
The Ukraine war is not simply a war between Russia and Ukraine but is primarily a proxy war between Russia and the United States, similar to how the Vietnam War was a US-Soviet/Chinese proxy conflict and the Crimean War (1853-1856) was a UK-French vs. Russian hegemonic war.
“the Ukraine war is not a war between Russia and Ukraine despite what you read every day it is primarily a war between Russia and the United States and it needs to be understood in those terms... the Vietnam War was not a war really between the United States and Vietnam it was a war between the United States and the Communist World especially the Soviet Union and China in which Vietnam was the Battleground”
In late 2021, Putin issued three demands to prevent war: (1) Ukrainian neutrality, (2) recognition of Crimea as part of Russia (its home since 1783), and (3) implementation of the Minsk II agreement; the U.S. refused to negotiate any of these, with Sachs personally telling the White House that clear commitment to non-NATO expansion could prevent the war.
“at the end of 2021 President Putin put down three demands one was neutrality the second was Crimea remains part of Russia as Crimea has been the home to the Lassie Fleet since 1783. and the third is that the Minsk to agreement should be implemented as Europe and Ukraine had promised but then remained on the United States refused to negotiate I know it because I spoke to the White House then and said what are you doing this is the basis for peace you can avoid this war just make clear NATO is not enlarging and the war will not happen they would not do it”
A neoconservative foreign policy doctrine emphasizing 'full spectrum dominance' and U.S. exceptionalism has controlled American foreign policy since 1992 under both parties (Clinton, Bush, Obama administrations), leading to wars in Iraq, Syria, interventions in Libya, Russia antagonism, and now Ukraine—representing an abject failure of strategy producing enormous U.S. costs and global instability.
“the authors of this were in both political parties in the Republican Party especially Cheney wolfowitz Rumsfeld in the Democratic party Hillary Clinton Victoria Newland President Biden and others this is a Doctrine which is rightly called neoconservatism but it's a doctrine of U.S exceptionalism and unipolarity that the U.S aim is dominance what they call full spectrum dominance meaning military technological and economic dominance of the United States in every major region of the world...this neoconservative group has been in charge of U.S foreign policy since 1992. I think it has been an abject disaster for the United States it has helped to create the war in Ukraine it's bringing us absolutely to the risk of World War III in East Asia over Taiwan”
Ancient wisdom traditions—including Confucianism, Buddhism, Judaism, Christianity, and Islam—share six core pillars: virtue ethics, recognition of human struggle between lower urges and higher calling, emphasis on reason in pursuing the higher calling, vision of perfection as spiritual/religious aspiration, integration of science and spirituality, and recognition of a single human family.
“there are at least six shared pillars of ancient wisdom across the Greeks Jewish and Christian Traditions Islamic faith Buddhism Hinduism and other ancient wisdom Traditions first they're all based on virtue ethics...second it emphasizes that humans struggle between lower urges let's cheat and take advantage and Higher Calling let's cooperate...it calls on reason...it says that we need a vision of perfection...fundamentally that there is a single Human family”
If Ukraine were armed to invade Crimea to retake territory, nuclear war would result; the escalatory logic of the Ukraine conflict could lead to nuclear weapons use if not de-escalated.
“if Ukraine were really to be armed to invade Crimea well there would then be nuclear war you would be told moments before we all are destroyed don't worry about it my advice to you was worry about it because we don't want to get there”
Wars fall into three distinct categories—wars of empire/plunder (strong vs. weak, wars of injustice), great power wars (strong vs. strong, wars of hegemonic competition), and inter-ethnic conflicts (weak vs. weak, wars of fear)—each requiring fundamentally different descriptive, predictive, and prescriptive approaches.
“I want to distinguish three categories of War One are Wars of the Empire or Wars of plunder a second is the great power conflicts that is the fights for who's number one that mirsheimer features in the tragedy of great power politics and the third is inter-ethnic conflict conflict between groups and I believe these are distinctive and they require not only distinctive descriptive and predictive theories but also distinctive...prescriptive uh normative approaches of how to stop these wars”
Britain invaded or attacked 171 out of 193 UN member states, making it the most violent country in the 19th century; the United States has been the most violent country since 1950, yet liberal democracies are not inherently peaceful—foreign policy is driven by relative power and imperial ambitions, not regime type.
“the countries in white there are 22 of them out of the 193 U.N member states never had an attack by Britain it's fascinating Britain was definitely the most violent country in the world in the 19th century uh and um the United States in my view is the most violent country in the world after 1950 and yet these are supposed liberal democracies but the basic point is liberal democracy has almost nothing to do with peaceful foreign policy foreign policy is about relative power”
Virtual exclusion of Russian athletes from the 2024 Olympics and bans on Russian cultural institutions (Tchaikovsky, ballet) are counterproductive to peace and violate the principles needed for inter-ethnic and inter-national reconciliation through shared culture and human connection.
“I really object to and disagree fundamentally with the call for example of excluding Russian athletes from the 2024 Olympics this is the opposite of what we need to find peace in the world and the Ukrainian demands to exclude Russian athletes or to stop playing Tchaikovsky or to stop Russian ballets is mind-bogglingly wrong it's the opposite of what we need for peace so I am a huge believer that ancient wisdom can help us to find Solutions...shared culture I which is extremely important”
International relations theory should function as a normative field prescribing solutions to war, not merely as a descriptive field explaining the causes of conflict, analogous to how medical schools aim to cure disease rather than only explain it.
“international relations theory is not just a description of the causes of war or the causes of War and Peace but the prescription of the way to peace as well international relations Theory should be inherently a normative field not only a positive or descriptive field it's not good enough to explain War we don't have medical schools to explain disease we have medical schools to cure disease”
John Mearsheimer's theory of great power politics is powerfully descriptive and predictive—correctly predicting China's rise would trigger U.S.-China conflict—but insufficiently prescriptive because it treats tragic great power competition as inevitable rather than solvable, treating inevitable tragedy as the endpoint rather than the starting point for solutions.
“while I admire John meersheimer enormously and were friends and we speak and communicate with each other often I want to go farther than this because mirsheimer says that the tragedy is inevitable of great power politics and I don't believe we can accept tragedy as our fate...we have to accept that as the start of international relations because we need not the tragedy of great power politics but the solution to the tragedy of great power politics we need the great power peace”
Gorbachev's decision to unilaterally disband the Warsaw Pact and seek peace with the West was enabled by extraordinary personal decency and genuine search for peaceful resolution, not merely Soviet weakness, and represented a miraculous opportunity for genuine great power cooperation that the United States then squandered.
“Gorbachev was a a miracle for the world because he believed in unilaterally disbanding the Warsaw Pact military Alliance of the Soviet Union and making a pieces between the Soviet Union and the west and the West meaning the United States and Europe basically and this was a dream unimaginable really that this could happen but it did happen and I attribute a great deal of it to not even to Russia's or the Soviet Union's weakness though that was undoubted and need for reform but actually to the extraordinary decency of this leader and the search for a a way uh forward peacefully”
The U.S. government will not explicitly commit to halting NATO expansion, either because of incomprehension and irresponsibility so extreme as to be unimaginable, or because of deliberate duplicity and intent to provoke conflict—either way representing a profound failure of diplomacy and commitment to peaceful resolution.
“they say this has nothing to do with NATO if it has nothing to do with NATO all the United States has to do tomorrow is to say nato is not enlargeable then we can test that theory versus my theory but they won't say it why because they have an intention to expand NATO and that is the goal and if it's not the goal then they are so unbelievably irresponsible not to have tried the alternative that it is unimaginable this is not to justify in Invasion and The Killing it is to help you understand”
The U.S. media, particularly in the UK and U.S. English-language press, has been recklessly reassuring audiences that nuclear war risks are minimal or manageable, promoting a false sense of safety that is dangerously incompetent or deliberately deceptive.
“when you're told don't worry you're reading something from foolish people because if you're not worried you don't get it and we need to pull back from the brink through the things I'm going to talk about rather than to push to the brink in this lackadaisical way that passes for the mainstream media...well don't worry about it it's unlikely that Putin will use nuclear weapons or don't be blackmailed and so forth Don't Be Afraid let me tell you be afraid have some sense”
Sovereignty and independence are the basic reasons that economic convergence occurred after 1950, enabling mass education which was previously impossible under empire, and mass education is the foundation for economic development.
“the basic reason for convergence is sovereignty the basic reason that sovereignty matters is that this is the beginning of mass education Pakistan and India in 1950 had illiteracy of 90 percent there was no Mass education because that's the essence of Empire is do not provide education and without education there was no economic possibility other than subjugation”
Inter-ethnic and intercommunal conflicts are driven by high fear factors and group identity, and are perpetuated by historical grievances and 'those who cannot forget history are condemned to repeat it,' making them distinct from great power conflicts and requiring group rights and inclusive political structures.
“intercommunal violence is a special kind of War it is conflict Amplified by group identity with very little communication between groups open hostility typically long lasting very high fear factors on both sides both sides are typically prisoners of History as my wife says those who can't forget history are condemned to repeat it”
Most U.S. congressmen making claims about China's threat have never been to China and lack passports or basic knowledge of the country, yet they shape U.S. policy toward the world's most populous nation, representing a failure of informed democratic governance.
“the U.S Congress held hearings on China's threat now I guarantee those people they probably don't even have a passport those congressmen they know nothing because I know them so I'm just I'm just giving you a hint”
The United States lacks a developed jurisprudence of group rights for ethnic and cultural minorities, instead emphasizing individual rights, making it difficult to manage multi-ethnic diverse communities peacefully; the Ottoman Empire's Millet system, despite hierarchies, provided useful group rights protections through self-jurisdiction and religious autonomy for non-Muslim populations.
“the United States does not have a concept of group rights for example in fact we're now going to probably see the end of so-called affirmative action in the United States because it violates individual rights will be the Supreme Court's likely decision we don't have a concept of how in a diverse multi-ethnic Community different ethnicities can have rights actually the Ottoman Empire in my view did a pretty good job of this the Ottoman Empire was a multi-ethnic community with the Millet system in which there was self-jurisdiction to an important extent of non-muslim populations and rights to practice religions within that”
A questioner observes that non-Western countries (Global South) have shown unprecedented 'coincidental maturity' by refusing to align with either the West or Russia on Ukraine, potentially signaling the emergence of a new international order that provincializes Western conflicts and could create opportunities for genuine multilateralism beyond the bipolar Cold War or unipolar post-Cold War system.
“for the first time you see an extraordinary coincidence perhaps of small medium and large Powers choosing uh to reneek from even taking a position...countries which are normally understood as client states of say Western powers or with shelter under the U.S military umbrella have proven recalcitrate and resistant and that I think is something utterly new...does it represent a kind of entirely novel form of albeit coincidental maturity political maturity”
The solution to inter-ethnic conflicts includes: group rights protections for minority groups; search for universal ethics of tolerance; intergroup dialogue; social and political structures of mediation; and shared culture including arts, sports, music, and literature that build common humanity.
“what are some potential partial answers which nobody has found I would say first group rights especially for minority groups within a political framework the search for Universal in ethics and I think that's where Alama Iqbal really comes in to this in ethics of Tolerance which is a special kind of Ethics which I'll come to in a moment Intergroup dialogue social and political structures of mediation and shared culture I which is extremely important Arts Sports music literature”
Most US presidents have been 'mediocrities or worse,' some outright criminals and some emotionally pathologically imbalanced; Franklin Roosevelt was the greatest US president and John F. Kennedy was the greatest president of Sachs' lifetime.
“I think most of our presidents have been mediocrities or worse some outright criminals some emotionally pathologically imbalanced uh and and a couple great leaders Franklin Roosevelt the greatest of our leaders for a reason that I will explain John F Kennedy the greatest leader of my lifetime”
The current world leadership is not in 'safe hands' on any side—not the UK government, not the US government, not governments around the world—and they are 'dangerous to your health.'
“the world is not in safe hands right now on any side not the government here not the government in the United States not governments around the world they're dangerous to your health”